I may or may not be live-Tweeting the Oscars. I'm @tvaziri.
Keep your expectations low.
A blogtacular blog filled with words, images, and whipped cream on top. Written by Todd Vaziri.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
The VFX Predictinator, 83rd Academy Awards Edition
Last May, when the Academy finally expanded the number of nominees for the visual effects Oscar from three to five, I wrote this:
My lovely wife, who essentially initiated The VFX Predictinator project, re-examined the data and determined that it would be fairly easy to tweak the formula and treat the data in essentially the same way as did the original formula. Certain multipliers were adjusted for five nominees and other relative formulas were also updated so that the weighting of various criteria would match the original formula. Ultimately, the updated Predictinator behaves in essentially the same way as the old one.
As we learned in January, the nominees for the visual effects Oscar for the 83rd Academy Awards are "Alice In Wonderland," "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1," "Hereafter," "Inception" and "Iron Man 2." And here is the data for these nominees:
And if you're not interested in squinting at the final scores, here they are:
"Potter," "Alice" and "Iron Man 2" all had similar numbers, with nearly identical box office earnings, but "Potter" and "Iron Man 2" lost points for being sequels. Both "Hereafter" and "Alice" suffered with poor critical acclaim, and "Hereafter's" box office, relative to the other blockbusters, gave the Clint Eastwood film no advantage. "Potter"'s second place score was earned with its late release date, coming to theaters in November (earning it a huge point).
Amazingly, this years' crop of nominees featured very little organic creature work. Only "Alice" qualified in the criteria of "Primary VFX Are Creatures," and also picked up more points with all of the facial animation featured in the film. With only 1/5 films heavily featuring character animation, the 2011 nominees are a bit of an anomaly, since regularly, most races include 2/3 or 3/3 films featuring character animation. Even with "Alice" earning these critical points for character animation, it still wasn't enough to topple "Inception"'s gargantuan point count. In fact, even if every other film earned those character animation points, it wouldn't have been enough to beat "Inception's" score.
So we shall see if The Predictinator can live again. If we're dead wrong, we'll have to determine how we screwed up, and perhaps, come up with a Predictinator 2.0 (for this new world order of five visual effects nominees), which will evolve over time. That would be unfortunate and, quite frankly, boring, since it feels quite gratifying to have a solid, mature algorithm to predict the winner of the visual effects Oscar. Starting over and patiently waiting year after year, nursing the formula back to health. Naah, we don't want to do that.
We'll know in just a few days, when the winners of the 83rd Academy Awards are announced February 27, 2011.
And what will this mean to The VFX Predictinator, our totally awesome formula that accurately predicted the visual effects Oscar winner across 21 years? It will require a serious overhaul, since many of the formulas are dependent on the assumption of three nominees. More likely than not, we'll have to come up with an all-new formula.
My lovely wife, who essentially initiated The VFX Predictinator project, re-examined the data and determined that it would be fairly easy to tweak the formula and treat the data in essentially the same way as did the original formula. Certain multipliers were adjusted for five nominees and other relative formulas were also updated so that the weighting of various criteria would match the original formula. Ultimately, the updated Predictinator behaves in essentially the same way as the old one.
As we learned in January, the nominees for the visual effects Oscar for the 83rd Academy Awards are "Alice In Wonderland," "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1," "Hereafter," "Inception" and "Iron Man 2." And here is the data for these nominees:
And if you're not interested in squinting at the final scores, here they are:
- 7.54 Inception
- 4.68 Harry Potter 7.1
- 3.96 Alice in Wonderland
- 3.58 Iron Man 2
- 2.39 Hereafter
"Potter," "Alice" and "Iron Man 2" all had similar numbers, with nearly identical box office earnings, but "Potter" and "Iron Man 2" lost points for being sequels. Both "Hereafter" and "Alice" suffered with poor critical acclaim, and "Hereafter's" box office, relative to the other blockbusters, gave the Clint Eastwood film no advantage. "Potter"'s second place score was earned with its late release date, coming to theaters in November (earning it a huge point).
Amazingly, this years' crop of nominees featured very little organic creature work. Only "Alice" qualified in the criteria of "Primary VFX Are Creatures," and also picked up more points with all of the facial animation featured in the film. With only 1/5 films heavily featuring character animation, the 2011 nominees are a bit of an anomaly, since regularly, most races include 2/3 or 3/3 films featuring character animation. Even with "Alice" earning these critical points for character animation, it still wasn't enough to topple "Inception"'s gargantuan point count. In fact, even if every other film earned those character animation points, it wouldn't have been enough to beat "Inception's" score.
So we shall see if The Predictinator can live again. If we're dead wrong, we'll have to determine how we screwed up, and perhaps, come up with a Predictinator 2.0 (for this new world order of five visual effects nominees), which will evolve over time. That would be unfortunate and, quite frankly, boring, since it feels quite gratifying to have a solid, mature algorithm to predict the winner of the visual effects Oscar. Starting over and patiently waiting year after year, nursing the formula back to health. Naah, we don't want to do that.
We'll know in just a few days, when the winners of the 83rd Academy Awards are announced February 27, 2011.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Oscar Pool Ballot
It's time for the Awesomest Oscar Pool Ballot In The History Of Oscar Pool Ballots.
Each year I create a special ballot based on the oscar.com printable ballot -- but on my ballot, each category has a different point value. The highest valued category is "Best Picture," while the mainstream films' categories are valued at two points. The non-mainstream categories (like the documentary and short film categories) are valued at one point.
This way, in a tight race for the winner, the winner most likely would not be determined by the non-mainstream films (i.e., blind guesses).
Download the ballot here and use it at your Oscar party.
And if you're wondering why Tom Cruise is on my ballot... he's on every one of my Oscar ballots. Because he's soooo cool.
Each year I create a special ballot based on the oscar.com printable ballot -- but on my ballot, each category has a different point value. The highest valued category is "Best Picture," while the mainstream films' categories are valued at two points. The non-mainstream categories (like the documentary and short film categories) are valued at one point.
This way, in a tight race for the winner, the winner most likely would not be determined by the non-mainstream films (i.e., blind guesses).
Download the ballot here and use it at your Oscar party.
And if you're wondering why Tom Cruise is on my ballot... he's on every one of my Oscar ballots. Because he's soooo cool.
Saturday, February 12, 2011
"Inception" Wins Big
Christopher Nolan's "Inception" won big at the 9th Annual VES Awards on February 1, 2011. "Inception" won in every category for which it was nominated, with awards also going to "Hereafter" and "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I."
Here are the winners of the live-action feature film categories. For a full list of winners, click here to visit Visual Effects Society's website.
Outstanding Visual Effects in a Visual-Effects Driven Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION
Paul Franklin, Chris Corbould, Mike Chambers, Matthew Plummer
Outstanding Supporting Visual Effects in a Feature Motion Picture
HEREAFTER
Michael Owens, Joel Mendias, Bryan Grill, Danielle Plantec
Outstanding Animated Character in a Live Action Feature Motion Picture
HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS: PART I - Dobby
Mathieu Vig, Ben Lambert, Laurie Brugger, Marine Poirson
Outstanding Created Environment in a Live Action Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION - Paris Dreamscape
Bruno Baron, Dan Neal, Graham Page, Per Mork-Jensen
Outstanding Models & Miniatures in a Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION - Hospital Fortress Destruction
Ian Hunter, Scott Beverly, Forest Fischer, Robert Spurlock
Outstanding Compositing in a Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION
Astrid Busser-Casas, Scott Pritchard, Jan Maroske, George Zwier
Here are the winners of the live-action feature film categories. For a full list of winners, click here to visit Visual Effects Society's website.
Outstanding Visual Effects in a Visual-Effects Driven Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION
Paul Franklin, Chris Corbould, Mike Chambers, Matthew Plummer
Outstanding Supporting Visual Effects in a Feature Motion Picture
HEREAFTER
Michael Owens, Joel Mendias, Bryan Grill, Danielle Plantec
Outstanding Animated Character in a Live Action Feature Motion Picture
HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS: PART I - Dobby
Mathieu Vig, Ben Lambert, Laurie Brugger, Marine Poirson
Outstanding Created Environment in a Live Action Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION - Paris Dreamscape
Bruno Baron, Dan Neal, Graham Page, Per Mork-Jensen
Outstanding Models & Miniatures in a Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION - Hospital Fortress Destruction
Ian Hunter, Scott Beverly, Forest Fischer, Robert Spurlock
Outstanding Compositing in a Feature Motion Picture
INCEPTION
Astrid Busser-Casas, Scott Pritchard, Jan Maroske, George Zwier